Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Research

Posted on: Wednesday 20 May 2026

This blog article has been prepared by Dr Emma Dean MFPM and Dr Harjeet Dhillon FFPM with input from the Clinical Trial Science & Regulations Expert Group to mark Clinical Trials Day 2026 (20 May).

 

The article presents the views of the authors and not necessarily those of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine (FPM).

 

20 May is International Clinical Trials Day, when the global research community comes together to commemorate James Lind’s 1747 scurvy trial, widely regarded as the birth of modern clinical research. As we celebrate this legacy today and honour the research community, it is also an opportunity to envisage the future. In this blog, we explore how Artificial Intelligence (AI) is embedded in clinical research today, and how we must adapt to oversee its anticipated expansion in scope, scale and impact in the future.

AI to Address a Pivotal Time in Clinical Research

Clinical trials remain the gold standard for evaluating new medicines, but drug development is under unprecedented pressure from rising trial complexity, fragmenting patient populations, slow timelines and increasing expense. With the average time to bring a medicine to market in Europe 12-13 years and global R&D costs exceeding £1.5 billion on average per approved product1, AI-enabled efficiencies are no longer optional in clinical development, but a strategic necessity.

The UK has the ingredients to uniquely benefit from AI-enabled trial innovation. Integrated longitudinal NHS datasets that are increasingly digitised, a progressive regulator and a strong life sciences and academic research sector together create conditions few others can match. Whilst it is sometimes challenging to separate hype from reality, several AI operational tools have already demonstrated tangible value in improving trial efficiency:

  • AI-enabled patient recruitment has improved enrolment in oncology trials using structured and unstructured Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to efficiently identify eligible participants and improve enrolment rates2.
  • Predictive analytics can forecast site performance, dropout risk and protocol deviations allowing proactive intervention in site selection cycles. Machine learning can support efficient sample size calculations and adaptive protocols, reducing trial duration and cost2.
  • Natural Language Processing (NLP) can automate extraction of clinical endpoints from free-text notes improving data completeness and improving burden2. Ambient Voice Technology (AVT) in NHS pilots can summarise consultations and shows how documentation and monitoring in trials can be reduced3.
  • AI-supported imaging analysis has improved sensitivity and consistency of pathological and radiological endpoints, supporting eligibility assessment and endpoint evaluation2.
  • Multimodal data interpretation from complex trial documentation, imaging, genomics, wearables and real-world data can all be synthesized by AI in a way exceeding human analytical capacity2.

AI-enabled efficiencies are no longer optional in clinical development, but a strategic necessity.

Regulatory Considerations and Potential Concerns

The UK regulatory landscape for AI in clinical research is evolving rapidly. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is responsible for defining a robust framework for the use of safe AI innovation in healthcare and research. However, specific AI legislation in clinical trials is more limited4 and incorporating AI in international decentralized clinical trials may be limited due to legal restrictions.

Key considerations are:

  • Classification of AI as a medical device: AI systems used for diagnosis, decision-making or trial endpoints may fall under the UK Medical Devices Regulations 2002 triggering requirements for validation, post-market surveillance and transparency4.
  • Data governance: The MHRA and NHS England emphasise data quality and auditability, with AI models trained on biased or incomplete datasets rising regulatory challenge5.
  • Explainability: Clinicians and regulators must be able to understand and trust AI outputs and interpret whether they are clinically meaningful5. Adaptive or continuously learning models raise concerns about versioning, drift monitoring ad re-certification6.
  • Accountability and ethical oversight: Fairness, privacy and patient trust are central with responsible stewardship and public engagement needed4.

Future Applications of AI

The future of AI will move beyond optimisation of existing processes – it will reshape trial design itself, potentially even predicting outcomes, patient responder subgroups or those at greater risk of adverse events. Agentic AI systems will orchestrate complex workflows to reduce administrative burden, synthetic control arms will reduce reliance on placebo / control groups (particularly in rare diseases), and decentralised hybrid trials will become more feasible reaching diverse patient populations in more remote locations. Real-time adaptive dosing will personalise trial treatment and blur the line between research and real-word clinical care, enabling greater relevance for pricing, reimbursement and access decisions.

The patient voice matters. Initiatives such as STANDING are developing standards for diverse and inclusive datasets in healthcare AI, with a focus on improving the completeness and consistency of data and reducing bias in model development7.  The role of the pharmaceutical physician will increasingly become that of a steward of AI-enabled evidence, ensuring scientific integrity and patient safety remain paramount.

The role of the pharmaceutical physician will increasingly become that of a steward of AI-enabled evidence, ensuring scientific integrity and patient safety remain paramount.

Equipping Ourselves for an AI-Driven Future

To thrive in an AI-enabled clinical research environment, UK professionals must build competencies in AI literacy2 (understanding model types, limitations and sources of bias, identifying over-confidence or AI hallucinations), data fluency (comfort with real-world evidence, digital biomarkers and data interpretation), regulatory awareness5 (MHRA guidance on AI as a medical device) and ethical judgement4 (ensuring fairness, safety and transparency).

Most importantly, as AI learners, we must embrace hands-on experimentation3 and engagement with AI-tools to embed practical experience into our daily activities. Perhaps this could start with using AI to support a protocol design, for evidence synthesis or signal detection and then expanding to other use cases. For pharmaceutical physicians, the risk is not adopting AI too quickly, but moving too slowly. AI is not a distant horizon – it is already shaping UK clinical research.

So please join FPM in recognising this important day by embracing the innovative spirit of James Lind. Let’s ensure that we all build the right skills to guide responsible AI adoption, and to shape a more efficient, equitable and patient-centred future for clinical research.

References

  1. Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Trials in the UK and EU. Article
  2. Artificial Intelligence Applied to Clinical Trials: Opportunities and Challenges. Article.
  3. AI in Practice. NHS England Digital
  4. How AI Is Used in Health and Current Regulatory Frameworks. GOV.UK
  5. Impact of AI on the Regulation of Medical Products. MHRA
  6. Reflection Paper on Use of AI in the Medicinal Product Lifecycle. EMA
  7. Standards for Inclusive AI in Healthcare. STANDING Together

You might also be interested in...

Women in Clinical Trials Webinar, Tuesday 9 June

Join us for an important webinar focusing on women in clinical trials and the need to address gender disparities across research and drug development.

If you’re an FPM member, please ensure you are logged in to My FPM to benefit from our member rates.